<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Jenny Factor: Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/11/the-jenny-factor-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/11/the-jenny-factor-part-2/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and ideas on the American condition in the 21st Century.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:59:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/11/the-jenny-factor-part-2/#comment-2244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garnetspy.com/?p=2424#comment-2244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now we&#039;re in 2010, The Columbia Tea Party refused to endorse Larry Grooms. His campaign has gone by the wayside and he has withdrawn.  Nikki Haley is a woman with a backbone.  We need backbones in our local politicians especially since some of them do not have one - much less a strong one.  
I have been told that SC will not elect a woman governor.  I disagree.  I think we need a governor who is principled and will stand with those principles - no matter the cost.  Such would be Governor Nikki Haley.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we&#8217;re in 2010, The Columbia Tea Party refused to endorse Larry Grooms. His campaign has gone by the wayside and he has withdrawn.  Nikki Haley is a woman with a backbone.  We need backbones in our local politicians especially since some of them do not have one &#8211; much less a strong one.<br />
I have been told that SC will not elect a woman governor.  I disagree.  I think we need a governor who is principled and will stand with those principles &#8211; no matter the cost.  Such would be Governor Nikki Haley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/11/the-jenny-factor-part-2/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garnetspy.com/?p=2424#comment-1399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, interesting post.  You offered some great analysis.

My worry centers on Jenny Sanford&#039;s endorsement of Mike Campbell in 2006, which didn&#039;t work out too well.

Some in the SCGOP power circles are just going to see this as the Sanford&#039;s thumbing their nose at the establishment rank-and-file yet again--as in not really a big surprise.

From what I am thinking--Nikki is trying to convince a lot of the party establishment that one major way she will be different than Sanford is that she&#039;ll work better with the General Assembly than he has and won&#039;t be as much of a grandstander looking to pick fights.

Where I hope the Jenny Sanford endorsement helps is keeping the reform minded conservative/tea party folks in the Haley fold and stop them from bleeding away to Grooms or somewhere else.  It&#039;s almost like a &quot;psychic wink&quot; to those conservatives who, despite all his failings, still recognize the value of Mark Sanford&#039;s brand of politics, that the real conservative to get behind is Nikki Haley.

I just hope it doesn&#039;t hinder Haley&#039;s efforts to appeal to the party insider types as a viable alternative to the so-called &quot;big three&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, interesting post.  You offered some great analysis.</p>
<p>My worry centers on Jenny Sanford&#8217;s endorsement of Mike Campbell in 2006, which didn&#8217;t work out too well.</p>
<p>Some in the SCGOP power circles are just going to see this as the Sanford&#8217;s thumbing their nose at the establishment rank-and-file yet again&#8211;as in not really a big surprise.</p>
<p>From what I am thinking&#8211;Nikki is trying to convince a lot of the party establishment that one major way she will be different than Sanford is that she&#8217;ll work better with the General Assembly than he has and won&#8217;t be as much of a grandstander looking to pick fights.</p>
<p>Where I hope the Jenny Sanford endorsement helps is keeping the reform minded conservative/tea party folks in the Haley fold and stop them from bleeding away to Grooms or somewhere else.  It&#8217;s almost like a &#8220;psychic wink&#8221; to those conservatives who, despite all his failings, still recognize the value of Mark Sanford&#8217;s brand of politics, that the real conservative to get behind is Nikki Haley.</p>
<p>I just hope it doesn&#8217;t hinder Haley&#8217;s efforts to appeal to the party insider types as a viable alternative to the so-called &#8220;big three&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WorkingTommy C</title>
		<link>http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/11/the-jenny-factor-part-2/#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WorkingTommy C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garnetspy.com/?p=2424#comment-1398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting points!  Thanks for the analysis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points!  Thanks for the analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

