<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tempest In A Tea Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/06/tempest-in-a-tea-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/06/tempest-in-a-tea-party/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and ideas on the American condition in the 21st Century.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:48:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unsweet Tea &#171; The Garnet Spy</title>
		<link>http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/06/tempest-in-a-tea-party/#comment-1698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unsweet Tea &#171; The Garnet Spy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garnetspy.com/?p=2347#comment-1698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] wrote about some of the problems three months ago and things don&#8217;t seem to have improved. My posts were met with varied responses with the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote about some of the problems three months ago and things don&#8217;t seem to have improved. My posts were met with varied responses with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WorkingTommy C</title>
		<link>http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/06/tempest-in-a-tea-party/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WorkingTommy C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garnetspy.com/?p=2347#comment-1503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr.  Hamilton:

Do you discuss people of different races in such stereotypical terms?

If conservatism at its most extreme is strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution as written then I&#039;m the most extreme conservative you&#039;ve ever had the pleasure of meeting.  

Those of us who have a better understanding of the law expressed in the Constitution have a lot of trouble with the unconstitutional actions of some people in the Republican Party--much less the same sorts of ideas espoused by most members of the Democrat Party in which you so obsequiously wallow.

People who want ANY sort of national solution/dictates on such items as abortion, religion, gun rights, and other issues explicitly and strictly forbidden to the federal government by the states is equally wrong in principle no matter if the federal level solution is seen by you to be &quot;conservative&quot; or &quot;liberal.&quot;

For example, the establishment of a national church is unconstitutional.  

By the same token, the forbidding by the federal government of states to establish state churches or religions  is also unconstitutional.  

Any time the Federal government steps between a citizen and his state&#039;s government except in those very few authorized instances described in the Constitution, it is a violation of our rights to govern ourselves as in &quot;consent of the governed.&quot;  

The fact is that the NORM for government since the beginnings of civilization has been despotism and tyranny wherever governments have been able to wield their power.  The Constitution is one of the very few instances where the liberties of states and individuals were to be protected by the restrictions respecting natural law that were placed on the central governing body (and hopefully serving as a model for the states in many regards) .  

The Constitution is the revolutionary document of our age and currently members of both parties are working to destroy it utterly and complete the transformation to a fascist, one party state.  No thanks.

Freedom is not risk-free.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr.  Hamilton:</p>
<p>Do you discuss people of different races in such stereotypical terms?</p>
<p>If conservatism at its most extreme is strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution as written then I&#8217;m the most extreme conservative you&#8217;ve ever had the pleasure of meeting.  </p>
<p>Those of us who have a better understanding of the law expressed in the Constitution have a lot of trouble with the unconstitutional actions of some people in the Republican Party&#8211;much less the same sorts of ideas espoused by most members of the Democrat Party in which you so obsequiously wallow.</p>
<p>People who want ANY sort of national solution/dictates on such items as abortion, religion, gun rights, and other issues explicitly and strictly forbidden to the federal government by the states is equally wrong in principle no matter if the federal level solution is seen by you to be &#8220;conservative&#8221; or &#8220;liberal.&#8221;</p>
<p>For example, the establishment of a national church is unconstitutional.  </p>
<p>By the same token, the forbidding by the federal government of states to establish state churches or religions  is also unconstitutional.  </p>
<p>Any time the Federal government steps between a citizen and his state&#8217;s government except in those very few authorized instances described in the Constitution, it is a violation of our rights to govern ourselves as in &#8220;consent of the governed.&#8221;  </p>
<p>The fact is that the NORM for government since the beginnings of civilization has been despotism and tyranny wherever governments have been able to wield their power.  The Constitution is one of the very few instances where the liberties of states and individuals were to be protected by the restrictions respecting natural law that were placed on the central governing body (and hopefully serving as a model for the states in many regards) .  </p>
<p>The Constitution is the revolutionary document of our age and currently members of both parties are working to destroy it utterly and complete the transformation to a fascist, one party state.  No thanks.</p>
<p>Freedom is not risk-free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/06/tempest-in-a-tea-party/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Hamilton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garnetspy.com/?p=2347#comment-1502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting post.  As a Democrat, this is out of my territory.  From where I sit, all of these people look pretty conservative.  I suppose it is like Eskimos having all those names for snow.  Maybe the teabaggers need more names for &quot;conservative.&quot;

I&#039;m not sure how effective religion is as a political filter.  I know plenty of liberal and conservative Catholics, Episcopalians and Presbyterians.  The most conservative of the people I know from those three groups should be right wing enough for anybody.   The most liberal people, sometimes from the same church, could fit in well at an ACLU meeting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post.  As a Democrat, this is out of my territory.  From where I sit, all of these people look pretty conservative.  I suppose it is like Eskimos having all those names for snow.  Maybe the teabaggers need more names for &#8220;conservative.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how effective religion is as a political filter.  I know plenty of liberal and conservative Catholics, Episcopalians and Presbyterians.  The most conservative of the people I know from those three groups should be right wing enough for anybody.   The most liberal people, sometimes from the same church, could fit in well at an ACLU meeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Pittman</title>
		<link>http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/06/tempest-in-a-tea-party/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregory Pittman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garnetspy.com/?p=2347#comment-1498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GS, I see you&#039;re enjoying retirement. :-) Actually, it looks like you&#039;ve moved into a different line of work rather than retiring.

Thanks for this inside look. I think the Republican party is as entrenched in South Carolina as it is anywhere else, and whatever it takes to get an (R) in the Governor&#039;s Mansion and State House is what will be done. If that means usurping the Tea Party movement for the sake of election wins, then so be it.

That&#039;s pretty much why I have started to refer to myself as &quot;conservative&quot; rather than &quot;Republican.&quot; I have learned that just because someone appends an R to their name doesn&#039;t mean they share my political views.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GS, I see you&#8217;re enjoying retirement. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Actually, it looks like you&#8217;ve moved into a different line of work rather than retiring.</p>
<p>Thanks for this inside look. I think the Republican party is as entrenched in South Carolina as it is anywhere else, and whatever it takes to get an (R) in the Governor&#8217;s Mansion and State House is what will be done. If that means usurping the Tea Party movement for the sake of election wins, then so be it.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty much why I have started to refer to myself as &#8220;conservative&#8221; rather than &#8220;Republican.&#8221; I have learned that just because someone appends an R to their name doesn&#8217;t mean they share my political views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich little</title>
		<link>http://garnetspy.com/2009/11/06/tempest-in-a-tea-party/#comment-1404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich little]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garnetspy.com/?p=2347#comment-1404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Above comment continued]   Within our &quot;Tea Party&quot; community we should expect fair, honest and open conversation on any given topic.  It would appear that opacity, rather than transparency, is among the ram-rodding techniques of Parks, et al.  That approach is in extreme contrast to the openness and transparency advocated and urged by Nikki Haley.  It is a firm indicator that Grooms backers, but hopefully not Grooms, are more interested in the old-style patronage system and &quot;good &#039;ol boyism&quot; rather than clarity and free speech!  I would expect candidate Grooms to make every effort to quash such activity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Above comment continued]   Within our &#8220;Tea Party&#8221; community we should expect fair, honest and open conversation on any given topic.  It would appear that opacity, rather than transparency, is among the ram-rodding techniques of Parks, et al.  That approach is in extreme contrast to the openness and transparency advocated and urged by Nikki Haley.  It is a firm indicator that Grooms backers, but hopefully not Grooms, are more interested in the old-style patronage system and &#8220;good &#8216;ol boyism&#8221; rather than clarity and free speech!  I would expect candidate Grooms to make every effort to quash such activity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

