Comments on: Obama’s Monica

By: Garnet Spy

Garnet Spy — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:56:20 +0000

LBD: if it walks like a duck..

By: Lamont B Dumont

Lamont B Dumont — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:21:30 +0000

Ooh, too early, my apologies for the double negative above.

By: Lamont B Dumont

Lamont B Dumont — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:20:28 +0000

Well, it worked with the Clintons, though there seems less to work with here. Of course, most people don’t understand the logical fallacy of putting your opponent in the position of having to prove a negative.
I’m sure if the Wingnut Wrong (I just can’t call those people “Right”) wants to portray our next president as unwholesome, there are plenty of people who are predisposed to accept that reading. They will not need nothing anymore substantive than the above.
Like I said, it worked with the Clintons. It accomplished its political purpose exceedingly well; it just served the Republic exceedingly poorly.
If you don’t have more than this, maybe you should go find something productive to do.

By: Obama’s Monica « The Political Inquirer

Obama’s Monica « The Political Inquirer — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:26:02 +0000

[...] CONTINUE… Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Clinton requires two, while Obama oneAn other endorsement and Bill doesn’t want to apologizeIllinois governor’s corruption charges touch Obama, TribuneThe Two Sides Of Bill Clinton [...]